For the final 22 months, we’ve observed the media retain up a continual drumbeat about how Trump colluded with Russia to sell Russian corporations uranium rights in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation. Oh, wait, the media hasn’t stated something about that. So, there was an investigation, and the investigation went on forever, and discovered nothing at all.
The Federalist reports:
In a 4-web page letter supplied to Congress on Sunday, Lawyer Basic William Barr officially revealed that Specific Counsel Robert Mueller did not discover any proof that President Donald Trump or members of his campaign treasonously colluded with the Russian government to steal the 2016 election from Hillary Clinton.
“The Specific Counsel’s investigation did not discover that the Trump campaign or any person linked with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election,” Barr’s letter to Congress noted.
No obstruction of justice:
The investigation headed by Mueller also examined whether or not Trump obstructed justice at any point connected to ongoing investigations of Russian interference. In his letter, Barr stated that Mueller’s investigation was unable to demonstrate that the president broke the law by interfering with law enforcement.
Just to count the price of the investigation, it was:
- 19 lawyers
- 40 FBI agents, intelligence analysts, forensic accountants, and additional
- two,800+ subpoenas
- 500 search warrants
- 500 witnesses
- more than $25 MILLION in taxpayer dollars
Try to remember, this is not the initially time that the media reported regularly on a story that match their radically-leftist narrative, but then was later disproven with proof. Try to remember how they breathlessly reported the charge that Brett Kavanaugh ran a secret gang rape cartel? How about when the Covington youngsters actually assaulted a peaceful native American who actually served overseas in Vietnam? How about the faked Jussie Smollett hate crime? This happens all the time.
Here’s some collusion with Russia
Try to remember this post from the radically leftist New York Instances?
At the heart of the tale are quite a few guys, leaders of the Canadian mining market, who have been key donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his household. Members of that group constructed, financed and sooner or later sold off to the Russians a corporation that would develop into identified as Uranium 1.
Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are amongst the most profitable in the planet, the sale gave the Russians handle of a single-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Given that uranium is regarded as a strategic asset, with implications for national safety, the deal had to be authorized by a committee composed of representatives from a quantity of United States government agencies. Amongst the agencies that sooner or later signed off was the State Division, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
As the Russians steadily assumed handle of Uranium 1 in 3 separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of money created its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman utilised his household foundation to make 4 donations totaling $two.35 million. These contributions have been not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, regardless of an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White Home to publicly recognize all donors. Other folks with ties to the corporation created donations as properly.
Why didn’t that get investigated for 22 months by a Specific Consel duting the Obama administration? Why didn’t the mainstream news mendia report on that for 22 months ahead of the 2016 presidential election?
Russia colluded with Barack Obama
And speaking of collusion with Russia, how come this was under no circumstances investigated:
Why didn’t actual collusion with the Russians deserve a 22-month Specific Counsel investigation? Why didn’t the media run that clip for 22 months asking why Obama was colluding with the Russians? You do not have to appear extremely far in his foreign policy to see actual examples exactly where we sided with the Russians against our allies, such as when Obama backed out of providing missile defense to Poland. Or when Obama stood by and did nothing at all soon after Russia ran tanks into Georgia in 2008. Or when Obama refused to sell anti-tank weapons to Ukraine, soon after Ukraine was invaded by Russia. Obama’s complete foreign policy was pro-Russia! It was ideal there in the open.
By the way, Trump did sell 210 Javelin anti-tank missiles to Ukraine, to defend themselves from Russia. But did the mainstream news media report on that? How specifically is promoting anti-tank missiles to Russia’s enemies “collusion with Russia”?
What about Obama?
What about the Obama administration? Have been they ever investigated for their quite a few scandals?
The Obama administration operating guns to Mexican drug cartels so they could get in touch with for additional gun handle when these guns have been utilised to kill Border Patrol agents. Or the Obama administration making use of the IRS as a weapon against conservative get-out-the-vote organizations, just just before his re-election campaign. And on and on. The media had nothing at all to say about these scandals.