I like airplanes, and provided the quantity I travel that is a very good issue. Seeing these extraordinary machines–aluminum and composite monuments of human ingenuity–makes the agony of most American airports pretty much bearable. (My genetically tanned, ambiguously ethnic look should scream “al-Qaeda!” I get patted down additional than Donald Trump’s hair on a windy day.) Contemporary airliners, as a single author place it, are “the most complex machines man has ever constructed.” But they are nonetheless regarded as the safest type of transportation. There are more than 20,000 industrial flights just about every day in the United States. If you have been to drive rather than fly a single of these routes, you would be 65 occasions additional most likely to be killed. Possibly additional surprising, given that 1980 the quantity of airplanes, flights, and passengers has doubled, but accidents per year have been declining. Flying is 5 occasions safer now than 30 years ago. How is that attainable? There are quite a few elements that contribute to air security, but a substantial a single is redundancy. Contemporary airliners are engineered so that every little thing required for flight has a back-up–engines, handle systems, computer systems, fuel lines, hydraulics, even the pilot. As a outcome no single failure should really result in an aircraft to crash. The brilliance of redundancy was displayed in 2010 when a Qantas A380, the world’s biggest passenger jet, skilled an “uncontained engine failure.” A single of the airplane’s 4 engines violently exploded in flight sending metal shrapnel via the wing and fuselage. (I’m guessing what the passengers skilled at that moment would be known as an “uncontained underwear failure.”) You can watch a video of the incident on the web. The A380 was severely broken. The engine was destroyed, various handle systems had been reduce by the flying debris, fuel was leaking, flaps on the left wing have been inoperable, and the landing gear broken. Nevertheless, the pilots have been capable to fly for pretty much two hours prior to landing safely. Redundancy saved the day. This lesson from civil aviation could be relevant for the church right now. Several churches, each huge and compact, look to engineer their ministries about the antithesis of redundancy–singularity. A single leader becomes the concentrate of practically every little thing that occurs, and I’m not just speaking about on Sunday morning. I’ve observed some churches grow to be paralyzed when the senior pastor is on getaway or even just out of the workplace. He is anticipated to offer guidance on just about every selection, just about every committee, just about every tiny detail of the church’s life and ministry. When it comes to the everyday operations of an organization, quite a few of us can recognize the dangers of singularity and say, as Jethro did to Moses, “What you are carrying out is not very good.” (Exodus 18:17). But what about the problem of singularity on a longer time horizon? For instance, I recommend watching this video of John Piper and Tim Keller discussing their churches’ succession plans. Keller shared how Redeemer Presbyterian is establishing a redundancy of leadership so his eventual retirement will not send the church into a tailspin. Redeemer is “engineering” various congregations, various leaders, and various teachers. At the time the video what shot, Bethlehem Baptist, John Piper’s church, didn’t but have a program. If Piper’s important function in the ministry all of a sudden failed or became vacant, it could have place the complete organization in jeopardy. (Considering the fact that the video was created the church has executed a transition program that replaced Piper with a further senior pastor, but Bethlehem Baptist did not restructure their ministry toward higher redundancy like Redeemer.) The danger of singularity is elevated by the current trend toward video-primarily based multi-web page congregations. Rather than mitigating the danger of possessing a single teaching pastor, it in fact compounds it by generating additional men and women and congregations dependent on a single individual. Now if that a single pastor leaves or “fails” quite a few additional items are place at danger. But anytime I’ve discussed this inherent danger with these operating video-primarily based multi-web page systems they invariably mention the efficiency and effectiveness of their model. Who can disagree? Using a single very gifted individual to effect thousands of men and women in various cities is unquestionably effective. And attempting to operate a multi-leader, multi-teacher, multi-congregation network is extremely complicated–as Tim Keller admits in the video. But who decided that efficiency and effectiveness have been the highest values for ministry? Creating airliners with various engines, fuel systems, computer systems, and flight controls is extremely complex. And all of these “redundant” components add a lot of weight to the airplane. Far more weight benefits in burning additional fuel to move it via the air. Burning additional fuel expenses the airlines additional funds to operate the airplane. These greater expenses are transferred to passengers in the type of greater fares. It could possibly be attainable to construct a extremely economical airplane with only a single engine, a single pilot, a single laptop (powered by Windows 7), and charge only $9.99 per passenger–but would you want to fly on it? Engineering a ministry for redundancy is not effective, but that shouldn’t quit us from investigating its other advantages. Take into consideration a story Leadership Journal published back in 2008 about group-primarily based leadership structure with no senior pastor, no superstar singularity. The church leadership group admitted the model had inefficiencies, but the redundancy also made stability. At a single point, a single of the church’s pastors was facing a rough season in his marriage. The rest of the group decided the most effective way to care for the couple was to give the pastor and his wife time away from the church to concentrate on healing. A single of the other pastors stated, “If he had been the senior pastor, the church couldn’t have handled the crisis. the whole church would have been handicapped by his inability to lead and shepherd through that season.” The redundancy constructed into the church’s structure permitted each the pastor’s marriage and the church to preserve steady flight. The group recalled the whole time as “really healthful.” The pastor’s marriage was strengthened and the church didn’t falter. Realizing the church can survive, and even thrive, for a season with out them could possibly give additional pastors the courage and honesty to seek aid for themselves or their marriages. But if the whole program is constructed on the premise of singularity rather than redundancy, it could maintain additional pastors in denial about their requirements or reluctant to share their issues. In brief, singularity could be additional effective in the brief run, but redundancy could maintain additional leaders serving and thriving in the extended run. Perhaps if the church discovered a handful of lessons from the aviation business we wouldn’t see so quite a few pastors and congregations crashing and burning. And with a excellent quite a few Child Boomer-led megachurches facing transitions, the danger could only be growing. So quite a few of these huge churches have been engineered on singularity–one extremely dynamic leader/teacher at the center of the ministry. How will they transition? How will they re-engineer their ministries? Will singularity continue to be the risky norm? Or will additional congregations come to embrace the wisdom of blessed redundancy?
Quit just living your life FOR God, and beginning living WITH him. The new With God Every day Devotional by Skye Jethani is delivered to your inbox just about every morning with reflections on Scripture, theology, culture, history, and present events. The short readings, Scripture, and prayers are made to transform your vision of God and his globe each and every day by drawing you into a deeper awareness of his presence. If you have read WITH, don’t miss this resource for building your communion with God. (Launches Aug 1, 2014) [button color=”bluelight” text=”white” url=”https://skyejethani.com/product/with-god-daily-devotional/” window=”_self”]Sign Up for the Devotional[/button] photo credit: Roger Schultz by means of photopin cc